Over a year ago, OWC partnered with SoftRAID to bring enhanced storage capabilities to the Mac, and we're now seeing that dream become a reality.
#Softraid 5 vs software#
Hardware RAID has long been thought to be superior to software RAID, but we've now combined the massive performance and capacity of ThunderBay 4 with a robust, proven software RAID engine to provide breathtaking performance, flexibility, and reliability.
#Softraid 5 vs install#
Activate advanced features, such as drive monitoring, e-mail notifications, and more when you install the included SoftRAID XT for macOS. Empower your workflow with up to 35% faster RAID 5 performance and exponentially faster rebuild times than comparable hardware based RAID arrays.
#Softraid 5 vs mac#
Latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.Experience the first and only software RAID 5 technology developed for the Mac with the SoftRAID XT. That system has four spinning disks in a raidz2 for i in do fio -directory=/mnt/pve/proxhosts_tafi -name=async_write_iops -rw=randread -bs=4K -direct=1 -sync=0 -numjobs=1 -ioengine=libaio -iodepth=64 -refill_buffers -runtime=300 -time_based -size=1G doneĪsync_write_iops: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64Īsync_write_iops: Laying out IO file (1 file / 1024MiB)
/SoftRAIDLite-57c439945f9b5855e58b06e9.jpg "softraid 5 vs")
I should also note the storage tested here is an NFS mount of a TrueNAS 13.0-U1 box on the same subnet. Let me know if anyone wants to see the output of all five iterations of each test. I've also pasted the result from a pveperf test run after both sets of fio benchmarks.
#Softraid 5 vs full#
I'm pasting the full output below of iteration 1 from each test. I ran each test five times and saw very consistent results. Thanks in advance for your configuration clues! I'm unclear on which is preferable, and could use your guidance before rebuilding this server. A few say hardware RAID is OK but use it with caching disabled. Reading through other threads here, most seem to suggest going with ZFS software RAID.
Pveperf reports relatively slow performance, especially with pveperf The controller is currently configured for a RAID 6 array with read and write caches enabled. In my lab I installed Proxmox VE 7.2 on this relatively old Supermicro server with an LSI MegaRAID 9260-4i controller with 4 x Seagate Ironwolf 1TB NAS drives. On a Supermicro server with a LSI 9260-i4 RAID controller and no battery backup with 4 HDDs attached, is it better to use software RAID with ZFS over hardware RAID? Why or why not? I'm new to Proxmox, and am looking for config recommendations to ensure the best balance of performance and data integrity.
0 kommentar(er)
